← На головну

Попередній перегляд перекладу

Англійський оригінал · основний файл
【Gongsun Chou, Part B】\n\nMencius said, "Opportunities of time vouchsafed by Heaven are not equal to advantages of situation afforded by the Earth, and advantages of situation afforded by the Earth are not equal to the union arising from the accord of Men. There is a city, with an inner wall of three li in circumference, and an outer wall of seven. The enemy surround and attack it, but they are not able to take it. Now, to surround and attack it, there must have been vouchsafed to them by Heaven the opportunity of time, and in such case their not taking it is because opportunities of time vouchsafed by Heaven are not equal to advantages of situation afforded by the Earth. There is a city, whose walls are distinguished for their height, and whose moats are distinguished for their depth, where the arms of its defenders, offensive and defensive, are distinguished for their strength and sharpness, and the stores of rice and other grain are very large. Yet it is obliged to be given up and abandoned. This is because advantages of situation afforded by the Earth are not equal to the union arising from the accord of Men. In accordance with these principles it is said, 'A people is bounded in, not by the limits of dykes and borders; a kingdom is secured, not by the strengths of mountains and rivers; the empire is overawed, not by the sharpness and strength of arms.' He who finds the proper course has many to assist him. He who loses the proper course has few to assist him. When this, the being assisted by few, reaches its extreme point, his own relations revolt from the prince. When the being assisted by many reaches its highest point, the whole empire becomes obedient to the prince. When one to whom the whole empire is prepared to be obedient, attacks those from whom their own relations revolt, what must be the result? Therefore, the true ruler will prefer not to fight; but if he do fight, he must overcome."\nMencius was about to go to court to see the king, when the king sent a person to him with this message, "I was wishing to come and see you. But I have got a cold, and may not expose myself to the wind. In the morning I will hold my court. I do not know whether you will give me the opportunity of seeing you then."\nMencius replied, "Unfortunately, I am unwell, and not able to go to the court."\nNext day, he went out to pay a visit of condolence to some one of the Dongguo family, when Gongsun Chou said to him, "Yesterday, you declined going to the court on the ground of being unwell, and today you are going to pay a visit of condolence. May this not be regarded as improper?"\n"Yesterday," said Mencius, "I was unwell; today, I am better. Why should I not pay this visit?"\nIn the meantime, the king sent a messenger to inquire about his sickness, and also a physician. Meng Zhongzi replied to them, "Yesterday, when the king's order came, he was feeling a little unwell, and could not go to the court. Today he was a little better, and hastened to go to court. I do not know whether he can have reached it by this time or not."\nHaving said this, he sent several men to look for Mencius on the way, and say to him, "I beg that, before you return home, you will go to the court."\nMencius felt himself compelled to go to Jing Chou's, and there stop the night. Mr. Jing said to him, "In the family, there is the relation of father and son; abroad, there is the relation of prince and minister. These are the two great relations among men. Between father and son the ruling principle is kindness. Between prince and minister the ruling principle is respect. I have seen the respect of the king to you, Sir, but I have not seen in what way you show respect to him."\nMencius replied, "Oh! what words are these? Among the people of Qi there is no one who speaks to the king about benevolence and righteousness. Are they thus silent because they do not think that benevolence and righteousness are admirable? No, but in their hearts they say, 'This man is not fit to be spoken with about benevolence and righteousness.' Thus they manifest a disrespect than which there can be none greater. I do not dare to set forth before the king any but the ways of Yao and Shun. There is therefore no man of Qi who respects the king so much as I do."\nMr. Jing said, "No. That was not what I meant. In the Book of Rites it is said, 'When a father calls, the answer must be without a moment's hesitation. When the prince's order calls, the carriage must not be waited for.' You were certainly going to the court. When you heard the king's order, then you did not carry your purpose out. This does seem as if it were not in accordance with that rule of propriety."\nMencius answered him, "How can you give that meaning to my conduct? The philosopher Zeng said, 'The wealth of Jin and Chu cannot be equalled. Let their rulers have their wealth; I have my benevolence. Let them have their nobility; I have my righteousness. Wherein should I be dissatisfied as inferior to them?' Now shall we say that these sentiments are not right? Seeing that the philosopher Zeng spoke them, there is in them, I apprehend, a real principle. In the empire there are three things universally acknowledged to be honorable. Nobility is one of them; age is one of them; virtue is one of them. In courts, nobility holds the first place of the three; in villages, age holds the first place; and for giving one's self the right to influence others, and governing the people, the two other things are not equal to virtue. How can the possession of only one of these be presumed on to despise one who possesses the other two? Therefore a prince who is to accomplish great deeds will certainly have ministers whom he does not call to go to him. When he wishes to consult with them, he goes to them. The prince who does not honor the virtuous, and delight in their ways of doing, to this extent, is not worth having to do with. Accordingly, there was the behavior of Tang to Yi Yin: he first learned of him, and then employed him as his minister; and so without difficulty he became sovereign. There was the behavior of Duke Huan to Guan Zhong: he first learned of him, and then employed him as his minister; and so without difficulty he became chief of all the princes. Now throughout the empire, the territories of the princes are of equal extent, and in their achievements they are on a level. Not one of them is able to exceed the others. This is from no other reason, but that they love to make ministers of those whom they teach, and do not love to make ministers of those by whom they might be taught. So did Tang behave to Yi Yin, and the duke Huan to Guan Zhong, that they would not venture to call them to go to them. If Guan Zhong might not be called to him by his prince, how much less may he be called, who would not play the part of Guan Zhong!"\nChen Zhen asked Mencius, saying, "Formerly, when you were in Qi, the king sent you a present of 2,000 taels of fine silver, and you refused to accept it. When you were in Song, they sent you 1,680 taels, which you accepted; and when you were in Xue, they sent you 1,200 taels, which you likewise accepted. If your declining to accept the gift in the first case was right, your accepting them in the latter cases was wrong. If your accepting them in the latter cases was right, your declining to do so in the first case was wrong. You must accept, Master, one of these alternatives."\nMencius said, "I did right in all the cases. When I was in Song, I was about to take a long journey. Travelers must be provided with what is necessary for their expenses. The prince's message was, 'A present against traveling expenses.' Why should I have declined the gift? When I was in Xue, I was apprehensive for my safety, and taking measures for my protection. The message was, 'I have heard that you are taking measures to protect yourself, and send this to help you in procuring arms.' Why should I have declined the gift? But when I was in Qi, I had no occasion for money. To send a man a gift when he has no occasion for it, is to bribe him. How is it possible that a superior man should be taken with a bribe?"\nMencius having gone to Pinglu, addressed the governor of it, saying, "If one of your spearmen should lose his place in the ranks three times in one day, would you, Sir, put him to death or not?" "I would not wait for three times to do so," was the reply.\n……
Китайська довідка · основний файл
【公孙丑章句下】\n\n孟子曰:天时不如地利,地利不如人和。三里之城,七里之郭,环而攻之而不胜。夫环而攻之,必有得天时者矣,然而不胜者,是天时不如地利也。城非不高也,池非不深也,兵革非不坚利也,米粟非不多也,委而去之,是地利不如人和也。故曰:域民不以封疆之界,固国不以山溪之险,威天下不以兵革之利。得道者多助,失道者寡助。寡助之至,亲戚畔之;多助之至,天下顺之。以天下之所顺,攻亲戚之所畔,故君子有不战,战必胜矣。\n孟子将朝王,王使人来曰:寡人如就见者也,有寒疾,不可以风。朝将视朝,不识可使寡人得见乎?\n对曰:不幸而有疾,不能造朝,\n明日,出吊于东郭氏,公孙丑曰:昔者辞以病,今日吊,或者不可乎?\n曰:昔者疾,今日愈,如之何不吊?王使人问疾,医来。\n孟仲子对曰:昔者有王命,有采薪之忧,不能造朝。今病小愈,趋造于朝,我不识能至否乎?\n使数人要于路,曰:请必无归而造于朝。\n不得已而之景丑氏宿焉。\n景子曰:内则父子,外则君臣,人之大伦也。父子主恩,君臣主敬。丑见王之敬子也,未见所以敬王也。\n曰:恶!是何言也?齐人无以仁义与王言者,岂以仁义为不美也?其心曰是何足与言仁义也云尔,则不敬莫大乎是。我非尧、舜之道,不敢以陈于王前,故齐人莫如我敬王也。\n景子曰:否,非此之谓也。礼曰:父召,无诺,君命召,不俟驾,固将朝也。闻王命而遂不果,宜与夫礼若不相似然。\n曰:岂谓是与?曾子曰:晋、楚之富,不可及也。彼以其富,我以吾仁;彼以其爵,我以吾义。吾何慊乎哉?夫岂不义,而曾子言之,是或一道也。天下有达尊三:爵一,齿一,德一。朝廷莫如爵,乡党莫如齿,辅世长民莫如德。恶得有其一以慢其二哉?故将大有为之君,必有所不召之臣,欲有谋焉,则就之。其尊德乐道,不如是不足与有为也。故汤之于伊尹,学焉而后臣之,故不劳而王;桓公之于管仲,学焉而后臣之,故不劳而霸。今天下地丑德齐,莫能相尚。无他,好臣其所教,而不好臣其所受教。汤之于伊尹,桓公之于管仲,则不敢召。管仲且犹不可召,而况不为管仲者乎?\n陈臻问曰:前日于齐,王餽兼金一百而不受;于宋,餽七十镒而受;于薛,餽五十镒而受。前日之不受是,则今日之受非也;今日之受是,则前日之不受非也。夫子必居一于此矣。\n孟子曰:皆是也。当在宋也,予将有远行,行者必以赆,辞曰:餽赆,予何为不受?当在薛也,予有戒心,辞曰:闻戒,故为兵餽之,予何为不受?若于齐,则未有处也。无处而餽之,是货之也。焉有君子而可以货取乎?\n孟子之平陆,谓其大夫曰:子之持戟之士,一日而三失伍,则去之否乎?曰:不待三。\n……

Довідка, а не основа перекладу

Запропоновані переклади

Завантаження...

Кіт із банкою для донатів

Підтримка проєкту Winds4UA

Кошти йдуть на розвиток і технічну підтримку проєкту, оплату сервера та домену. І на каву розробнику · без неї воно якось не пишеться.

Підтримати Куди йдуть кошти